Tuesday, February 25, 2020


The Department of State’s Visa Bulletin guru, Charlie Oppenheim, hosts monthly meetings with the American Immigration Lawyers Association.  Mr. Oppenheim is the Department of State’s Chief of the Control and Reporting Division. He is the officer who is responsible for producing the Visa Bulletin each month.

Charlie offered a number of interesting observations about the March Visa Bulletin, which resulted in a retrogression for EB-3.

-Because of the potential for USCIS to move resources to EB-1 and EB-2 and the unpredictability in processing times that will be caused by such a resource allocation, Charlie does not expect any forward movement to the EB-3.  The absolute earliest would be the May 2020 or June 2020 Visa Bulletin, but EB-3 could remain at January 2017 until the end of the fiscal year.  Charlie did assure readers that

-While it is expected that the implementation of the public charge rules may slow USCIS processing times, any potential slowdown at USCIS has not been factored into the March Visa Bulletin.

-DOS was not surprised that the retrogression happened in March, in spite of the January and February progression of dates in some EB-3 categories.  DOS wanted to wait until it was certain that the increase in demand was not showing any signs of decline.

Friday, February 21, 2020


The March 2020 retrogression of EB-3 has significant consequences for those who are in the immigrant visa process.  It is expected that between March 1 and September 30 of this year, immigrant visas/green cards will only be issued to immigrants who have a 2016 priority date or earlier.  When the first bulletin of the next fiscal year is released in late September, we expect the Rest of World EB-3 to return to current and the Philippines EB-3 to have a roughly 18-24-month retrogression.  

Below are strategies for EB-3 immigrant applicants in various stages of the immigrant visa process:

Immigrants who will be adjusting status
USCIS has indicated that the dates for filing chart can be used in March. This means that the I-485 can only be filed if the immigrant has a priority date earlier than January 1, 2019.  This applies to both Filipino and Rest of World immigrant applicants. 

Immigrants currently at NVC phase with fee bill
If the applicant has already received fee bills, then the case can continue to be processed until the documentarily qualified notification is received from NVC.  An embassy interview will not be scheduled until the immigrant’s priority date is current under the final action chart which for March is January 1, 2017.  This applies to both Filipino and Rest of World immigrants.

Immigrants with approved I-140 but no fee bill
Immigrants should only receive the fee bill if the priority date is earlier than the date for filing of January 1, 2019, only we often see the NVC issue fee bills to those who have priority dates later than the dates of filing chart.  Those immigrants with 2019 and 2020 priority dates will receive a letter from NVC explaining that the case cannot move forward and a fee bill issued until the priority date is current under the date for filing chart.  Rest of World immigrants will continue to receive fee bills and be able to proceed through the NVC process but will not be able to receive an embassy interview until current under the final action chart.

Immigrants with embassy interviews scheduled for March
We expect these interviews will be rescheduled by the Embassy or Consulate until the priority date is current under the final action chart.

Thursday, February 20, 2020


The March 2020 retrogression of the EB-3 category means that the US government has "overshot" their usage of visas in Fiscal Year 2020 (Oct 2019 - Sept 2020).  In order to remedy this, the government retrogresses the visas, which serves as a pause on the issuance of new visas.  The Philippine EB-3 date retrogressed because of increasing demand for Worldwide immigrant visas.  The Worldwide cut-off date can never be less favorable than any other country’s date.

This happens every few years.  Visa approvals will slow or stop starting in March, until the end of the fiscal year in September.  In October 2020, new allotment 140,000 visas are released into the system.  There is a chance that more visas are released into the system before the end of the Fiscal Year because, from time to time, the government's pause has its intended effect and more visas can be released before year-end.

If you are in any part of the visa process and you do not have your visa issued before March 1, 2020, your case will be held in abeyance at the Embassy or NVC, unless you have a priority date earlier than January 1, 2017 (Worldwide and Philippines). 

Tuesday, February 18, 2020


The Department of State has just issued the March 2020 Visa Bulletin. This is the sixth Visa Bulletin of Fiscal Year 2020. This blog post analyzes this month's Visa Bulletin.

March 2020 Visa Bulletin

Table A: Final Action Dates -- Applications with these dates may be approved for their Green Card (Permanent Residency card) or Immigrant Visa appointment.

All Other

MU Law Analysis

All Other: The All Other EB-1 had a four-month progression and the EB-2 category remained current.  Both should stay in their current ranges for the foreseeable future.  The EB-3 is retrogressed back to Jan 2017.  This retrogression occurred in all categories, except for China and India, where the retrogression is worse.  No forward movement is expected in EB3 for the rest of the fiscal year.  Demand in All Other EB-3 Adjustment of Status cases is responsible for the retrogression.

China: All Chinese EBs improved slightly.  Chinese EB-3 will not progress beyond the January 2017 retrogression date in all other EB-3 categories.

India:  There was virtually no progress for India.  We continue to expect very little progress in either category in future months.

Philippines:  The Philippine EB-3 number continues to confound.   We were encouraged by the three-month progression in EB-3 in February, only to be surprised by the retrogression back to January 2017.  Adding to the complexity is that virtually no Philippine EB-3s have been issued at Manila since the beginning of the year

Thursday, February 13, 2020


The H-1B cap filing date will be here before you know it.  New H-1Bs are subject to the H-1B cap lottery and must be filed between March 1-20, 2020.  The USCIS will notify us of H-1B cap lottery winners by March 31, 2020.  If you are preparing to file an H-1B cap petition for 2020, please send MU the items on our checklist no later than March 10.

A variety of types of case are subject to H-1B cap:
-International students working on an EAD card under an OPT or CPT program 
 after having attended a U.S. school;
-International employees working on a TN may need an H-1B filed for them in
 order for them to pursue a permanent residency (green card) case;
-Prospective international employees in another visa status e.g. H-4, L-2, J-1, 
 F-1; H-1B workers with a cap exempt organization; and
-Prospective international employees currently living abroad.

These types of case are not subject to H-1B cap:
-H-1B amendments/extensions/transfers
-When the employee has been in H-1B status for less than 6 years
-Trade Visas (H-1B1, E-3, TN-1) Chile, Singapore, Australia, Canada, Mexico
-Institution of higher education (or its affiliated or related nonprofit entities), a 
 nonprofit research organization, or a government research organization.

Please contact us if you have any questions or are looking for representation in filing H-1B cap petitions.

Wednesday, February 5, 2020


On January 31, 2020, the President issued a Presidential Proclamation expanding the existing travel ban to include the following countries: Burma (Myanmar), Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria, Sudan, and Tanzania. 

The new travel ban goes into effect February 21, 2020 at midnight.  Individuals from countries on the new travel ban who have received their visas before February 21, 2020 can still enter the US. However, we recommend that individuals from the newly banned countries enter before the travel ban goes into effect on February 21, 2020.

The government will be reviewing the banned countries on October 1, 2020, and annually thereafter. If the banned countries comply with the US on information sharing, the country may be removed from the banned list. 

The full travel ban now includes the following thirteen countries and different types of visas are banned for each country:

Suspends the entry of immigrants, except as Special Immigrants who have provided assistance to the U.S. government.
Suspends the entry of immigrants, except Special Immigrants who have provided assistance to the U.S. government.
Suspends the entry of immigrants and all nonimmigrants, except F (student), M (vocational student) and J (exchange visitor) visas, though they are subject to enhanced screening.
Suspends the entry of immigrants and temporary visitors on business or tourist visas (B-1/B-2).
Suspends the entry of immigrants, except Special Immigrants who have provided assistance to the U.S. government.
Suspends the entry of immigrants, except Special Immigrants who have provided assistance to the U.S. government.
North Korea
Suspends the entry of all immigrants and nonimmigrants.
Suspends the entry of immigrants and requires enhanced screening of all nonimmigrants.
Suspends the entry of Diversity Visa immigrants
Suspends the entry of all immigrants and nonimmigrants.
Suspends the entry of Diversity Visa immigrants
Suspends the entry of certain government officials and their family members on business or tourist visas (B-1/B-2).
Suspends the entry of immigrants and temporary visitors on business or tourist visas (B-1/B-2).

Citizens of the banned countries who are already present in the United States can file for extensions of status, changes of status, or for green cards (adjustment of status). 

If you are a citizen of one of the banned countries, please reach out to your MU attorney for further guidance. 

Monday, February 3, 2020


On August 14, 2019 the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced a new “public charge” rule.  The rule was set to into effect on October 15, 2019, but was stopped by a nationwide injunction.  On January 27, 2020 the US Supreme Court lifted the nationwide injunction.  Note that an injunction still remains in effect in Illinois.  On February 24, 2020 the new public charge rule will go into effect.

Under a longstanding law and policy, if immigration authorities determine someone is “likely to become a public charge” the US can deny the applicant’s green card or other visa to the US.  A public charge is someone who is dependent on the government, through benefits programs.  The Trump Administration’s new rule changes the standard by the DHS determines whether a foreign national is likely to become a public charge.

Under the previous policy, DHS examined whether an intending immigrant was primarily dependent on public benefits.  Under the new rule, immigration officers will examine whether immigrants are likely at any time to become a public charge, using a multi-factor test. 

Public benefits under the new rule include:
1)   Any federal, state, or local cash assistance, including:
a.    Social Security Income (SSI)
b.    Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
c.    Government programs for income maintenance often called “general assistance”
2)   Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) also known as food stamps
3)   Section 8 Housing Assistance
4)   Medicaid, with certain exceptions
5)   Public Housing under Section 9

The immigration officer will take into account a broad range of factors and consider all of the following when making a determination if the foreign national visa applicant is likely to become a pubic charge:
a.  Receipt of a public benefit for more than 12 months in the aggregate within a 36 month period
b.    Age
c.    Health
d.    Family status
e.    Education and skills
f.    Assets, resources, and financial status 

This rule will apply to all applicants for any type of visa, though it is expected that the immigration officers will look most closely at those applying for a green card.  Employment-based visa applicants should be treated favorably because, by virtue of their employer-sponsor, they have guaranteed employment and income in the United States.  However, policy experts forecast that this rule will likely be applied inconsistently and cause fewer legal immigrants to enter the United States.