PHILIPPINE NURSES CHOOSING TO WORK ABROAD

Philippines nurses seem to be choosing contract positions with an aim toward moving abroad.   ABS-CBN News reports that ACT-Teachers party-list Rep. France Castro questioned why there did not appear to be an increase in permanent (Plantilla) healthcare positions in the last year.   

Rep. Angelica Natasha Co speculated that healthcare workers opt for temporary or contractual positions when they have plans to work abroad.  Last year saw one of the greatest numbers of Philippine nurses enter the US in many years, as the American nursing shortage continues to get worse.  As of 2021, about 300,000 Philippine nurses worked abroad.

MAY 2023 VISA BULLETIN: EB-3 RETROGRESSION

The Department of State just issued the May 2023 Visa Bulletin. This blog post analyzes this month's Visa Bulletin.

Visa Bulletin 

Table A: Final Action Dates -- Applications with these dates may be approved for their Green Card (Permanent Residency card) or Immigrant Visa appointment.

 

EB	All Other	CHINA	INDIA	PHILIPPINES
EB-1	C	01FEB22	01FEB22	C
EB-2	15FEB22	08JUN19	01JAN11	15FEB22
EB-3	01JUN22	01APR19	15JUN12	01JUN22
Other workers	01JAN20	15APR15	15JUN12	01JAN20

USCIS

The USCIS is expected to use Table A: Final Action Dates chart for I-485 employment-based filings. A Beneficiary must be current on the above Table A chart in order to file their I-485, Adjustment of Status applications. See: USCIS Visa Bulletin Dates

MU Law Analysis 

The May 2023 Visa Bulletin retrogressed Philippines and Worldwide EB-3 to June 1, 2022.  This means that unless the Beneficiary has a priority date earlier than June 1, 2022, they will unfortunately not be able to proceed with a visa appointment.  MU Law expects that this June 1, 2022 date will not progress until at least October 1, 2023.  The October 2023 Visa Bulletin, which should be released by the State Department in mid-September 2023, will be the next time that we may see forward movement in the EB-3 category. 

On the good news front, China EB-3 actually progressed five months to April 1, 2019.  China EB-2, India EB-3 and India EB3 remained unchanged.  Philippine and ROW EB-3 Other Workers, which is the category for occupations such as Nurse Aides, remains retrogressed but held steady to January 2020.

221g PROBLEM CONTINUES AT MANILA

The Manila Post continues to refuse to issue immigrant visas to nurses as has been the case since before the pandemic.   The Post issues 221g letters or outright denials.  

We had been given some assurance in the spring that the problem was solved but it has not.

We are trying to get Congressional action and agency action with the aim of solving the problem.  Unfortunately, it may take some time because we have to reengage our prior contacts. 

If you have been issued a 221g or a denial and would like to be involved please contact your I-140 petitioner.  The I-140 petitioner (US employer) can then contact Chris Musillo who is helping coordinate the effort.  We must have the US employer involved. 

DOS: NO EB-3 PROGRESSION UNTIL AT LEAST UNTIL MAY OR JUNE

The Department of State’s Visa Bulletin guru, Charlie Oppenheim, hosts monthly meetings with the American Immigration Lawyers Association.  Mr. Oppenheim is the Department of State’s Chief of the Control and Reporting Division. He is the officer who is responsible for producing the Visa Bulletin each month.

Charlie offered a number of interesting observations about the March Visa Bulletin, which resulted in a retrogression for EB-3.

-Because of the potential for USCIS to move resources to EB-1 and EB-2 and the unpredictability in processing times that will be caused by such a resource allocation, Charlie does not expect any forward movement to the EB-3.  The absolute earliest would be the May 2020 or June 2020 Visa Bulletin, but EB-3 could remain at January 2017 until the end of the fiscal year.  Charlie did assure readers that

-While it is expected that the implementation of the public charge rules may slow USCIS processing times, any potential slowdown at USCIS has not been factored into the March Visa Bulletin.

-DOS was not surprised that the retrogression happened in March, in spite of the January and February progression of dates in some EB-3 categories.  DOS wanted to wait until it was certain that the increase in demand was not showing any signs of decline.

STRATEGIES FOR DEALING WITH THE EB-3 RETROGRESSION

The March 2020 retrogression of EB-3 has significant consequences for those who are in the immigrant visa process.  It is expected that between March 1 and September 30 of this year, immigrant visas/green cards will only be issued to immigrants who have a 2016 priority date or earlier.  When the first bulletin of the next fiscal year is released in late September, we expect the Rest of World EB-3 to return to current and the Philippines EB-3 to have a roughly 18-24-month retrogression.  

Below are strategies for EB-3 immigrant applicants in various stages of the immigrant visa process:

Immigrants who will be adjusting status

USCIS has indicated that the dates for filing chart can be used in March. This means that the I-485 can only be filed if the immigrant has a priority date earlier than January 1, 2019.  This applies to both Filipino and Rest of World immigrant applicants. 

Immigrants currently at NVC phase with fee bill

If the applicant has already received fee bills, then the case can continue to be processed until the documentarily qualified notification is received from NVC.  An embassy interview will not be scheduled until the immigrant’s priority date is current under the final action chart which for March is January 1, 2017.  This applies to both Filipino and Rest of World immigrants.

Immigrants with approved I-140 but no fee bill

Immigrants should only receive the fee bill if the priority date is earlier than the date for filing of January 1, 2019, only we often see the NVC issue fee bills to those who have priority dates later than the dates of filing chart.  Those immigrants with 2019 and 2020 priority dates will receive a letter from NVC explaining that the case cannot move forward and a fee bill issued until the priority date is current under the date for filing chart.  Rest of World immigrants will continue to receive fee bills and be able to proceed through the NVC process but will not be able to receive an embassy interview until current under the final action chart.

Immigrants with embassy interviews scheduled for March

We expect these interviews will be rescheduled by the Embassy or Consulate until the priority date is current under the final action chart.

WHAT DOES THE PHILIPPINE AND WORLDWIDE RETROGRESSION MEAN FOR EB-3 VISAS?

The March 2020 retrogression of the EB-3 category means that the US government has "overshot" their usage of visas in Fiscal Year 2020 (Oct 2019 - Sept 2020).  In order to remedy this, the government retrogresses the visas, which serves as a pause on the issuance of new visas.  The Philippine EB-3 date retrogressed because of increasing demand for Worldwide immigrant visas.  The Worldwide cut-off date can never be less favorable than any other country’s date.

This happens every few years.  Visa approvals will slow or stop starting in March, until the end of the fiscal year in September.  In October 2020, new allotment 140,000 visas are released into the system.  There is a chance that more visas are released into the system before the end of the Fiscal Year because, from time to time, the government's pause has its intended effect and more visas can be released before year-end.

If you are in any part of the visa process and you do not have your visa issued before March 1, 2020, your case will be held in abeyance at the Embassy or NVC, unless you have a priority date earlier than January 1, 2017 (Worldwide and Philippines). 

VISA REFUSALS AT THE US EMBASSY IN MANILA

Musillo Unkenholt is aware that the US Embassy in Manila has refused to approve almost any immigrant visa for the last 3 weeks.  The problem is, apparently, that the Embassy is mistakenly interpreting clauses in employment contracts between nurses and their US employers, perhaps based on some bad information that was sent to the Embassy. 

The problem seems to be localized in Manila.  Philippine nationals processing for immigrant visas at other embassies around the world are being issued their immigrant visas.  Likewise, other embassies are also issuing immigrant visas to non-Philippine nationals. 

We are working with clients, trade associations, and nurses to solve this problem.  It may take a little while to solve the problem but it is a fairly straightforward problem that will be solved, hopefully in the next few weeks.

JUNE VISA BULLETIN: ANALYSIS AND PREDICTIONS

The Department of State has just issued the June 2019 Visa Bulletin. This is the ninth Visa Bulletin of Fiscal Year 2019. This blog post analyzes this month's Visa Bulletin. 

June 2019 Visa Bulletin

Table A: Final Action Dates -- Applications with these dates may be approved for their Green Card (Permanent Residency card) or Immigrant Visa appointment.

  

EB  Class	All Other	CHINA	INDIA	PHILIPPINES
EB-1	22APR18	22FEB17	01JAN15	22APR18
EB-2	C	01AUG16	19APR09	C
EB-3	C	15SEP15	01JUL09	01NOV18

Table B: Dates for Filing -- The DOS may work on applications with these dates. But the Visa cannot be approved until the date is current per Table A.

EB  Class	All Other	CHINA	INDIA	PHILIPPINES
EB-1	01SEP18	01OCT17	01OCT17	01SEP18
EB-2	C	01NOV16	01JUN09	C
EB-3	C	01JAN16	01APR10	01JAN19

  

MU Law Analysis (all references are to Table A unless noted)

All Other: The EB-1 category moved about 7 weeks.  We expect continued steady movement in this category for All Other.  We do not see any retrogression in the future for EB2 or EB3, other than the usual retrogression at the end of the Fiscal Year.

China: China EB-2 moved 2+ months, moving more than one year so far in 2019’s calendar months.  EB-3 moved ahead half as fast – about three weeks -- which reflects continued demand in EB-3, likely related to the many EB-3 “downgrades”.  EB-2 remains superior to EB-3.

India: There was very little movement in any of the Indian categories.  EB-1 will almost surely not move in FY 2019.  We do not expect any significant Indian movement this fiscal year.  Longer term, we are slightly more optimistic about India EB-3, which should progress faster than EB-2.

Philippines: The EB-3 date leaped again.  It should be into 2019 shortly, and we do not expect any retrogression in the near future. 

MARCH 2019 VISA BULLETIN: ANALYSIS AND PREDICTIONS

The Department of State has just issued the March 2019 Visa Bulletin. This is the sixth Visa Bulletin of Fiscal Year 2019. This blog post analyzes this month's Visa Bulletin.

 

March 2019 Visa Bulletin

Table A: Final Action Dates -- Applications with these dates may be approved for their Green Card (Permanent Residency card) or Immigrant Visa appointment.

 

EB  Class	All Other	CHINA	INDIA	PHILIPPINES
EB-1	01JAN18	22FEB17	22FEB17	01JAN18
EB-2	C	01JAN16	09APR09	C
EB-3	C	08JUL15	22MAY09	01DEC17

Table B: Dates for Filing -- The DOS may work on applications with these dates. But the Visa cannot be approved until the date is current per Table A.

EB  Class	All Other	CHINA	INDIA	PHILIPPINES
EB-1	01JUN18	01OCT17	01OCT17	01JUN18
EB-2	C	01MAY16	22MAY09	C
EB-3	C	01JAN16	01APR10	01MAR18

 

MU Law Analysis (all references are to Table A unless noted)

 

All Other: The EB-1 category moved one month.  We expect continued steady movement in this category for All Other.  We do not see any retrogression in the future for EB2 or EB3, other than the usual retrogression at the end of the Fiscal Year.

 

China: China EB-2 moved three months, moving a total of a half year in just two calendar months.  EB-3 only moved one week, as demand continues in EB-3, likely related to the many EB-3 “downgrades”. 

 

India: There was very little movement in any of the Indian categories.  We are slightly more optimistic about India EB-3, which could continue to progress faster than EB-2.

 

Philippines: The EB-3 date showed great progress, improving four more months.  By next month, we should see the EB-3 priority date extend into FY2018.

PHILIPPINES REMOVED FROM H-2 VISA LIST

The USCIS has published a notice in the Federal Register announcing changes to countries who are eligible to supply workers pursuant to the H-2 visa program.  The Philippines is no longer one of the countries that is eligible to supply workers under this program. 

This is an annual notice publication that covers the period from January 19, 2019 – January 18, 2020. 

It is important to note that this has no impact whatsoever on Registered Nurses, Physical Therapists, Medical Technologists and other allied healthcare workers.  These healthcare workers are normally filed under the H-1B visa (temporary non-seasonal workers) or Green Cards (Permanent residents).  H-2 visas are normally associated with agricultural workers, trades workers in fields like construction, and other seasonal workers such as those in resorts or the fishing industry.

The rationale for eliminating the Philippines from the H-2 program is explained in the report.  This decision will be revisited in January 2020.

The Philippines has a high H-2B overstay rate. In FY 2017, DHS estimated that nearly 40 percent of H-2B visa holders from the Philippines overstayed their period of authorized stay. Additionally, among all U.S. posts throughout the world, U.S. Embassy Manila issues the greatest number of T-derivative visas (T-2, T-3, T-4, T-5, T-6), which are reserved for certain family members of principal T-1 nonimmigrants (certain victims of a severe form of trafficking in persons). U.S. Embassy Manila issued approximately 40 percent of the total T-derivative visas issued worldwide from FY 2014-2016. A recent review of certain T-1 status recipients, whose spouses were issued T-2 visas during this same period, shows that approximately 60 percent were determined to have been trafficked to the United States on H-2B visas. DHS and DOS are concerned about the high volume of trafficking victims from the Philippines who were originally issued H-2B visas and the potential that continued H-2B visa issuance may encourage or serve as an avenue for future human trafficking from the Philippines. DHS and DOS also believe that these overstay and human trafficking concerns are severe enough to warrant removal from the H-2A visa program as well. This concern is informed by a four-fold increase in H-2A visa applications from nationals of the Philippines between FY 2015-2018. The Philippines' continued inclusion creates the potential for abuse, fraud, and other harm to the integrity of the H-2A or H-2B visa programs.